CHAMGAP
APPROVEDReviewed and approved by the Chamgap Editorial Team (2026-07-11). The draft was written by AI, the existence of all 4 cited sources was verified at the original page, and the verdict passed blind grading and adversarial audit. Methodology v0.6.
Verdict No. 270 · Search date 2026-07-11 · Methodology v0.6

Kanna extract,
does it really help with Relief of stress and anxiety?

30-Second Summary
D
Evidence Grade D · 35 · Safety caution
Small acute experiments showed signals, but pooled anxiety outcomes did not differ from placebo
What the
research shows
A meta-analysis of four randomized trials and 117 participants found no anxiety benefit from kanna: RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.56-1.83, p=0.98). Positive findings are limited to an fMRI surrogate in 16 people and selected time points in a 20-person laboratory-stress study. Nell 2013 was a safety trial without prespecified efficacy variables and is excluded from efficacy evidence; the small literature supports D rather than F, with 35 points.
What the
ads claim
Marketing links traditional mood support, serotonin-reuptake and PDE4 mechanisms, calmness, and focus to clinical anxiety relief. Direct evidence mostly consists of acute healthy-volunteer studies and surrogate outcomes using the branded Zembrin extract.
*

Useful facts when choosing a product

  • Most efficacy studies used a single 25 mg dose or short-term Zembrin exposure.
  • A three-month 37-person trial was designed for safety and did not prespecify efficacy variables.
  • The 2023 meta-analysis found no anxiety difference from placebo across four trials with 117 participants.
  • Safety data for combination with serotonergic medicines are limited because of possible serotonergic activity.
Gap Measurement · Verdict 270 · D 35
What advertising claims
What independent, higher-quality research supports
△ GAP
01

What the research actually shows

The Terburg 2013 crossover trial gave a single 25 mg dose of Zembrin to 16 healthy participants and reported lower amygdala threat reactivity and amygdala-hypothalamus coupling. Reay 2020 conducted two experiments in 20 healthy young adults; the first multitasking experiment found no treatment effect, while the second simulated public-speaking task found selected subjective-anxiety and heart-rate interaction signals. The Gouhie 2023 meta-analysis pooled four randomized trials with 117 participants and reported anxiety RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.56-1.83, p=0.98, showing no difference.

02

Why this is classified as D (35)

The anxiety result in a meta-analysis of four randomized trials and 117 participants was null, while positive signals were confined to a 16-person fMRI surrogate and selected points in a 20-person laboratory study, supporting D with 35 points. Nell 2013 is excluded from efficacy evidence because it prespecified no efficacy variables.

Counterpoint. A limited signal remains for acutely induced anxiety responses and threat-processing circuitry in the laboratory.

Rejudgment record. Reassessment (cross-check reflected) — Acute neuroimaging and laboratory-stress signals in 16 to 20 healthy participants conflict with a null meta-analysis of four randomized studies and 117 participants; no confirmatory clinical anxiety-disorder trial exists

Cross-check — Codex and Claude

This verdict was drafted by Codex through literature review and source-existence checks, cross-checked through blind grading and adversarial audit, and settled by reapplying the methodology boundary rules. Cases with split grades were resolved through rejudgment.
03

Evidence Table

StudyDesignSampleFundingEndpointResultWeight
Terburg D et al. 2013Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover fMRI trial16Linked to the Zembrin developerAmygdala threat reactivity and connectivityA single 25 mg dose reduced amygdala reactivity and amygdala-hypothalamus coupling.Supportive
Reay J et al. 2020Two double-blind placebo-controlled experiments20Participation by an author from the branded-ingredient companyLaboratory stress, subjective anxiety, heart rate, and skin conductanceThe first experiment was negative; the second public-speaking task showed selected anxiety and heart-rate signals.Supportive
Gouhie FA et al. 2023Systematic review and meta-analysis117UnknownAnxiety outcomeRR 1.01, 95% CI 0.56-1.83, p=0.98, showing no difference from placebo.Key
Nell H et al. 2013Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled safety trial37Linked to the Zembrin developerThree-month safety and tolerabilityDoses of 8 mg and 25 mg were generally tolerated, but no efficacy variables were prespecified.Safety
§

Receipt — 4 References

All 4 cited sources were verified for existence at the original page (as of 2026-07-11).

Terburg D, Syal S, Rosenberger LA, Heany S, Phillips N, Gericke N, Stein DJ, van Honk J. 2013. Acute Effects of Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin), a Dual 5-HT Reuptake and PDE4 Inhibitor, in the Human Amygdala and its Connection to the Hypothalamus. Neuropsychopharmacology. 38(13):2708-2716. PMID: 23903032. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.183.
checked
Reay J, Wetherell MA, Morton E, Lillis J, Badmaev V. 2020. Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin®) ameliorates experimentally induced anxiety in healthy volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol. 35(6):e2753. PMID: 32761980. DOI: 10.1002/hup.2753.
checked
Gouhie FA, Rodrigues JPA, Vieira LF, Cunha CLN, Yuyama EK. 2023. Sceletium tortuosum effects on anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Disorders. 11:100092. DOI: 10.1016/j.dscb.2023.100092.
checked
Nell H, Siebert M, Chellan P, Gericke N. 2013. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of Extract Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin) in healthy adults. J Altern Complement Med. 19(11):898-904. PMID: 23441963. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2012.0185.
checked
Draft and rewrite: Codex (AI) · Verification: Codex blind grading and adversarial audit · Final adjudication: Claude
Reviewed and approved: Chamgap Editorial Team · Approval date: 2026-07-11 · Corrections: none

Cite this verdict

Kanna extract (Sceletium tortuosum) x Relief of stress and anxiety Evidence Grade D card
[Chamgap] Kanna extract (Sceletium tortuosum) x Relief of stress and anxiety — Evidence Grade D·35. 4 cited sources checked. Source: https://health-receipt.pages.dev/en/verdicts/mood/kanna-stress-anxiety/ · CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0 — free to use with attribution; do not distort grades, numbers, or verdict meaning.

!

What this document does and does not do

Chamgap is an information source. It reports what research has and has not confirmed; it does not tell readers what to take or buy. That decision belongs to readers and, when needed, medical or legal professionals. This verdict reflects literature available up to the search date and may change as new research appears. Nothing here is medical advice.